The International Advanced Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies

International Indexed Journal | Multi-Disciplinary Refereed Research Journal
E-ISSN : 2455-295X
Impact Factor Value : 5.983 (SJIF)
Journal DOI : 10.21276/2455-295X
Peer-Reviewed Journal - Equivalent to UGC Approved Journal
World Wide Most Trusted Research Publication Platform Since 2024

Publication Policies and Ethics

The International Advanced Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IAJMS) strictly complies with moral justice and ethics, and will conduct a legal review if required on a case-by-case basis. The journal ensures that reproducing or promoting a manuscript does not influence the decision of the editors.

Responsibilities of Authors

An author is expected to be responsible for the presented data and information in their respective article along with taking the responsibility for its significance.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

Confidentiality

Reviewers should not share any information from an assigned manuscript with outsiders without the prior permission of the Editor or preserve the data from an assigned manuscript.

Competence

Reviewers should only complete the review if they possess fair expertise. An assigned Reviewer with inadequate expertise should responsibly decline the review.

Constructive Assessment

Reviewer comments should appreciate positive aspects, identify negative aspects constructively, and indicate the enhancement needed. A reviewer should explain and support their judgment clearly. The reviewer should ensure that an observation or argument that has been previously reported be accompanied by a relevant citation and should immediately alert the Editor when aware of duplicate publication.

Impartiality and Integrity

The reviewer's decision should solely depend on scientific merit, relevance to the subject, and the scope of the journal, rather than on financial, racial, ethnic origin, etc., of the authors.

Disclosure of Conflict of Interest

To the extent feasible, the reviewer should minimize the conflict of interest. In such a situation, the reviewer must notify the editor describing the conflict of interest.

Timeliness and Responsiveness

Reviewers should morally abide by providing the review comments within the stipulated time and be active enough in responding to the queries raised by the editor if any.

Responsibilities of Editor and Editorial Board

Maintaining Integrity

Editors have a responsibility to maintain the integrity of the published literature, if required, by publishing errata or corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern as quickly as possible. The editor must comply with the policy guidelines provided by the publisher and fulfill the responsibilities bestowed upon with integrity.

Review Process Oversight

Editors are responsible for monitoring and ensuring the fairness, timeliness, thoroughness, and civility of the peer-review editorial process.

Towards Readers and Scientific Community

  • Ensure that the content or the author information present in the manuscript is legible.
  • Evaluate all manuscripts such that they fall within the scope of the journal.
  • Maintain the journal's internal integrity by suggesting corrections, dealing with retraction, supplemental data, etc.
  • Work with the publisher to attract the best manuscripts and research that will be of interest to readers.
  • Ensure that all involved in the publication process understand that it is inappropriate to manipulate citations.

Journal Role

Publisher Role

Journals published by **The International Advanced Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies (IAJMS)** follow a timely rigorous peer review process to bring recent and novel scientific information at its best possible mode. As a publisher, the following policies are considered:

Guidelines for Retracting Articles

**IAJMS** takes the responsibility to maintain the integrity and completeness of the scholarly record very seriously. Articles that have been published shall remain extant, exact, and unaltered as far as possible. However, occasional unavoidable circumstances may arise where after publication the article requires retraction or removal. Such actions can only occur under exceptional circumstances.

The core objective of these measures is to maintain the integrity of the academic record.

Encouraging and Ensuring Academic Integrity

Encouraging Ethical Research

  • Request evidence of ethical research approval for all relevant submissions and be prepared to question authors about aspects, such as, how patient consent was obtained or what methods were employed to minimize animal suffering.
  • Ensure that reports of clinical trials cite compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki 6th revision, Good Clinical Practice and other relevant guidelines to safeguard participants.
  • Ensure that reports of experiments on or studies of, animals cite compliance with the US Department of Health and Human Services Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals or other relevant guidelines.

Ensuring the Integrity of the Academic Record

  • Take steps to reduce covert redundant publication, e.g., by requiring all clinical trials to be registered.
  • Ensure that published material is securely archived.
  • Have systems in place to give authors the opportunity to make original research articles freely available (Open Access).
  • Preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards. Errors, inaccurate or misleading statements must be corrected promptly and with due prominence. Editors should follow the COPE guidelines on retractions.